El haiku en el zen japonés
Article Sidebar
Publicado
oct 11, 2017
Main Article Content
Resumen
Este ensayo de divulgación cultural describe las relaciones históricas e intertextuales entre las enseñanzas y las prácticas del budismo zen y la forma poética del haiku en Japón.
Article Details
Como citar
HERNÁNDEZ-ESQUIVEL, Christian Emmanuel.
El haiku en el zen japonés.
La Colmena, [S.l.], n. 74, p. 73-76, oct. 2017.
ISSN 2448-6302.
Disponible en: <https://lacolmena.uaemex.mx/article/view/5625>. Fecha de acceso: 19 ago. 2026
Número
Sección
Aguijón
Citas
Faure, B. (1987), “The Daruma-shū, Dūgen and Sūtū Zen”, Monumenta Nipponica, vol. 42, núm. 1, pp. 25-55.
Ford, J. I. (2006), Zen Master Who?: A Guide to the People and Stories of Zen, Boston, Wisdom Publications.
Furuta, S. (1967), “El desarrollo del pensamiento Zen en el Japón”, Estudios Orientales, vol. 2,núm. 1, pp. 13-39.
Grenard, J. L. (2008), “The Phenomenology of Koan Meditation in Zen Buddhism”, Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, vol. 39, pp. 151–188.
Hakamaya, R. (1989), Hongaku shisō hihan, Tokio, Daizo Shuppan.
Heine, S. (1990), “Does the Koan Have Buddha-Nature?: The Zen Koan as Religious Symbol”, Journal of the American Academy of Religionvol. 58, núm. 3, pp. 357-387.
Heine, S. (1994), Dogen and the Koan Tradition. A Tale of Two Shobogenzo, Albany, State University of New York Press.
Heine, S. (1997), “The Dōgen Canon: Dōgen’s Pre-Shōbōgenzō Writings and the Question of Change in His Later Works”, Japanese Journal of Religious Studies, vol. 24, núms. 1, 2, pp. 39-85.
Heine, S. (2004), Opening a Mountain. Koans of the Zen Masters, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Rosemont, H. (1970), “The Meaning Is the Use: Kōan and mondō as Linguistic Tools of the Zen Masters”, Philosophy East and West, vol. 20, núm. 2, pp. 109-119.
Silva, A. (2005), El libro del haiku, Buenos Aires, Bajo la luna.
Williams, D. (2009), The Other Side of Zen: a Social History of Soto Zen Buddhism in Tokugawa Japan, Nueva Jersey, Princeton University Press.
Yu, C. F. (1979), “Ta-hui Tsung-kao and Kung-an Ch’an”, Journal of Chinese Philosophy, vol. 6, pp. 211-235.
Ford, J. I. (2006), Zen Master Who?: A Guide to the People and Stories of Zen, Boston, Wisdom Publications.
Furuta, S. (1967), “El desarrollo del pensamiento Zen en el Japón”, Estudios Orientales, vol. 2,núm. 1, pp. 13-39.
Grenard, J. L. (2008), “The Phenomenology of Koan Meditation in Zen Buddhism”, Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, vol. 39, pp. 151–188.
Hakamaya, R. (1989), Hongaku shisō hihan, Tokio, Daizo Shuppan.
Heine, S. (1990), “Does the Koan Have Buddha-Nature?: The Zen Koan as Religious Symbol”, Journal of the American Academy of Religionvol. 58, núm. 3, pp. 357-387.
Heine, S. (1994), Dogen and the Koan Tradition. A Tale of Two Shobogenzo, Albany, State University of New York Press.
Heine, S. (1997), “The Dōgen Canon: Dōgen’s Pre-Shōbōgenzō Writings and the Question of Change in His Later Works”, Japanese Journal of Religious Studies, vol. 24, núms. 1, 2, pp. 39-85.
Heine, S. (2004), Opening a Mountain. Koans of the Zen Masters, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Rosemont, H. (1970), “The Meaning Is the Use: Kōan and mondō as Linguistic Tools of the Zen Masters”, Philosophy East and West, vol. 20, núm. 2, pp. 109-119.
Silva, A. (2005), El libro del haiku, Buenos Aires, Bajo la luna.
Williams, D. (2009), The Other Side of Zen: a Social History of Soto Zen Buddhism in Tokugawa Japan, Nueva Jersey, Princeton University Press.
Yu, C. F. (1979), “Ta-hui Tsung-kao and Kung-an Ch’an”, Journal of Chinese Philosophy, vol. 6, pp. 211-235.